What makes it even more frustrating is that it would take so little effort to present the information in a way that actually explains the trend. A couple of relevant percentages, a timeline, or even a simple comparison of export shares over the decades would have made the story far clearer — and genuinely informative.
But instead, we get these “factoid clusters” that feel analytical while leaving readers with no real understanding of what changed or why it matters. It’s like data decoration: numbers added for aesthetic effect rather than substance.
This kind of reporting also erodes trust. When people notice that the numbers don’t actually support the claim, it makes them question the credibility of the article as a whole. And when people don’t notice, it shapes public understanding based on shaky or incomplete reasoning.
In the end, good journalism isn’t just about throwing in statistics — it’s about choosing the right ones and giving them context. Without that, even accurate numbers can end up being misleading. - luxuryhomeremodeling.net