March 01, 2021

Weaponising cultural appropriation

The starting point for the idea of cultural appropriation is solid: it's problematic when some people (usually white) are rewarded or praised for displaying or producing or performing something when the originators of that thing (usually POC) are put down or reviled for it. The entire early history of rock and roll was plagued by this (see Pat Boone for some egregious examples but don't assume he was the only one), the entire "Indian sports mascot" business basically monetised the images of Native Americans even while suppressing the people themselves, and of course the theatre and film industries have historically been really really bad about putting white people in roles of all ethnicities (even when they weren't explicitly blackfacing) and not even letting non-white people act at all, or later, only letting them act in specifically designated "ethnic roles".

So, there's a lot of history, some areas are improving, and we have a lot of work still to do.

But lately we have a lot of people who haven't thought it through (or who have but don't care) that are putting forward a complete nonsense interpretation of the concept that goes something like: the only people who can most authentically interpret the works of an artist are people that match them perfectly on every demographic axis, and furthermore, nobody who isn't a perfect match should even be permitted to try.

Which is how we arrive at this caricature of a scandal, where a powerfully compelling Black poet specifically chooses a person as her preferred translator, but critics raise a fuss that because the person is nonbinary and white, rather than female and Black, that they shouldn't be permitted to write the translation. Apparently white nonbinary folks are only allowed to translate works by other white nonbinary folks? Which is obviously nonsense, and I think even the "critics" here would reject that formulation as nonsense, and possibly knock it down as a straw-man argument. But it's not. Stepping in to override the stated preference of the original poet, denying her agency in the whole matter, throws this all into crystal-clear relief, but this is just the most recent example of at least a decade of very strange demands and decisions and complaints. People have complained about Avatar and Korra because many of the voice actors are not themselves of Asian descent; there's plenty to complain about in the way Korra handled race and culture (in a big step back from Avatar) but the idea that the characters in a fictional land that is not even Asia. can only have voices that issue from pedigreed Asian Mouths is so offensively essentialist that it's hard to believe anyone could take it seriously (but they definitely do). You will hear people seriously claim that only gay actors should be playing gay roles, which is just as silly as racial requirements: actors have to play romantic attraction to people they are not personally attracted to all the time.

And more generally: translators and actors and performers have to inhabit feelings and emotions and reactions that are not natively theirs, and have learned their craft over decades, centuries, millennia, to figure out how to convey that thought anyway. Acting is applied empathy: you are never a perfect match for the role you're playing, but you find the place in your heart that your self relates to the role—perhaps in only a small way—and magnify it, with help from your director and fellow cast, until you've got the best interpretation of the role you can give. Your difference from the role might be sexual orientation; another actor's might be race; yet another might be different in that they grew up well-to-do and the character is poor. Gorman's chosen translator did not grow up Black in America and can't have a perfect angle on the Black female American experience. But they can read Gorman's poetry in English and dive into it and interpret it with their own lens into the best damn nonbinary-white-Dutch translation of Gorman's work that they can.

And why the fuck are we putting a stop to that?

"What would it take for these news organizations and pundits to actually break with the convention that both side are equally at fault? This is the clearest, starkest situation one can imagine short of civil war. If this won't do it, nothing will." --Paul Krugman

Posted by blahedo at 11:07pm on 1 Mar 2021
Comments
The only people who can most authentically interpret the works of fiberglass insulation and an artist are people who match them perfectly on every demographic axis, and furthermore, nobody who isn't a perfect match should even be permitted to try. Posted by Linda at 5:01pm on 16 May 2024
Ethnic origin does not matter in our company when carrying out Cincinnati drywall. We all play our part. Posted by James at 2:57am on 8 Aug 2024
People have complained about Avatar and Korra because many of the voice actors are not of Asian descent. How's the Sheet rock tape? Posted by Cielo at 9:56pm on 22 Nov 2024
The idea that only people who perfectly match a work’s demographic can interpret it seems to ignore the power of art to transcend boundaries. At our Reiki practice, we don’t focus on labels or demographics. Inner healing is a universal need, so we welcome all individuals. Posted by Ava at 3:11am on 26 Nov 2024
You will hear people seriously claim that wallpaper a room actors should be playing gay roles, which is just as silly as racial requirements. Posted by wallpaper a room at 3:02pm on 28 Nov 2024
In our company it does not matter anything goes. Its acting, not real life. Posted by Maria at 1:33pm on 11 Jan 2025
Good stuff. Nice post Drainage Cheers my friend Posted by Max at 5:44pm on 16 Feb 2025
Ideas to know the Weaponising cultural appropriation are good, and I like to learn more. While using the Wollongong Tree Removal Pros I saw these updates are the best and provide great results. Posted by Amber Dempsey at 6:38pm on 18 May 2025
This is such a thoughtful piece. Cultural appropriation is real and harmful, but gatekeeping empathy, art, and interpretation based on identity checklists misses the point and silences the very voices we claim to support. Mural Wallpaper Posted by Thatwallpaperguy at 11:39am on 29 May 2025
Thanks for sharing this interesting article here. brick mason Posted by Jack at 12:17pm on 24 Jun 2025
This comment critiques how the valid concept of cultural appropriation is being misused and "weaponized," leading to illogical demands (like only demographically matched artists translating or performing) that stifle artistic interpretation and empathy. insulation company new jersey Posted by Jersey Insulation Pros at 12:54pm on 24 Jun 2025
Appreciate the effort you put into this. Well-written and informative. stone masonry Posted by Ella at 3:07pm on 24 Jun 2025
Why am I just discovering this now?? Please send updates to www.drywallcorpuschristi.com. :) Posted by www.drywallcorpuschristi.com at 7:42pm on 27 Jun 2025
People have complained about who is the best drywall company Even Avatar, and Korra because many of the voice actors are not of Asian descent; Posted by who is the best drywall company at 4:05pm on 1 Jul 2025
This is so interesting because I have been looking for chimney guides and glad I found this website! Posted by Dorothy at 4:37pm on 27 Jul 2025
Great post! I really enjoyed reading this and learned something new. asphalt driveway Posted by Ella at 1:51pm on 25 Aug 2025
Thanks for taking the time to share this informative content here. asphalt striping Posted by Jack at 4:11pm on 25 Aug 2025
Keep up the great work. Looking forward to more posts like this. erosion control Posted by Mark at 4:38pm on 26 Aug 2025
I'm glad to check this site; it's very informative. laser skin treatments Posted by Saphire at 2:58pm on 28 Aug 2025
This is such a sharp and well-argued take. I really appreciate how you highlight the difference between addressing genuine cultural appropriation versus stretching the concept into something counterproductive and even harmful. Denying an artist’s own choice of translator, for example, feels like stripping away their agency in the name of “protection,” which is deeply ironic. Your point about acting and translation being forms of empathy really resonated with me—it’s about connection, not demographic checkboxes. It reminds me a bit of how tools like Mail Monitor work: they don’t replace human judgment but instead provide context and clarity to ensure the real message comes through. Art should be allowed that same space for interpretation, without unnecessary gatekeeping. Posted by Amber Brion at 9:48am on 1 Sep 2025
This community is awesome. I like how supportive people are. Brick Repair Posted by Ezra at 2:11pm on 2 Sep 2025
This was a really sharp and necessary take. I think you hit the nail on the head when you described acting and translation as applied empathy—crafts that are literally about reaching across difference rather than being confined by it. It’s frustrating how quickly a useful concept like cultural appropriation can get flattened into rigid, essentialist rules that actually erase agency from the very people it’s meant to protect. Your examples—from Pat Boone to Amanda Gorman’s translator—really show how messy the real-world dynamics are, and why nuance matters. It reminds me of how in other industries, like Mobile pool construction service, success comes from a combination of honoring traditions, using the right tools, and adapting thoughtfully to new contexts—not from gatekeeping who’s “allowed” to build or create. Thanks for putting this in such clear terms! Posted by Kate Sharma at 10:56am on 4 Sep 2025
It’s always nice to read different opinions and experiences here. pool enclosure Posted by Amarah at 2:24pm on 5 Sep 2025
Post a comment









Say whether the tens digit of this number is even or odd: 885
 [?]

Remember personal info?






Valid XHTML 1.0!